RTDRS vs CDRT: which Alberta tribunal handles my dispute?
Last updated
Short answer: RTDRS for landlord-tenant disputes. CDRT for condo-corporation disputes. The two don't overlap — pick the one that matches your relationship to the dispute.
That sounds obvious, but it confuses people because both tribunals deal with “living in a condo.” The key is not the building — it's who you're fighting with.
Side-by-side
| Question | RTDRS | CDRT |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Residential Tenancy Dispute Resolution Service | Condominium Dispute Resolution Tribunal |
| Governing statute | Residential Tenancies Act | Condominium Property Act |
| Who disputes whom | Tenant ↔ landlord | Owner ↔ condo corporation |
| Launched | 2006 (in operation 20+ years) | April 1, 2026 |
| Typical disputes | Rent arrears, damage deposits, repairs, eviction, lease breaches, end-of-tenancy disputes | Bylaw fines, document access, general-meeting irregularities |
| Filing fee | $75 | $150 |
| Self-representation | Yes (designed for it) | Yes (designed for it) |
| Process | Filing → hearing → order | Filing → guided negotiation → mediation → adjudication |
| Decision timeline | Weeks to a few months | Weeks to a few months (60 days post-hearing) |
| Appeal | Court of King's Bench, 30 days | Court of King's Bench, question of law only, 30 days |
What each one CAN'T do
RTDRS won't hear
- Disputes between a condo owner and their corporation (that's CDRT)
- Disputes over commercial leases (RTDRS is residential only)
- Property damage claims over $100,000 (those go to Court of King's Bench)
- Disputes about whether the bylaw itself is reasonable
CDRT won't hear
- Disputes between a landlord and their tenant — even if the tenant lives in a condo unit (that's RTDRS)
- Neighbour-to-neighbour disputes inside a condo building (parking arguments, noise complaints between units)
- Insurance and deductible disputes
- Director-election and board-conduct issues (outside the meeting framework)
- Claims for general damages — only Court of King's Bench awards those
The "I'm a tenant in a condo" scenarios
Owners who don't live in their condo and rent it out create the most confusion. Here's the breakdown:
Scenario 1: corporation sends a fine notice to your unit
The notice names you (the tenant) or the owner. The corporation wants the fine paid.
Forum: CDRT (only the owner can file). You: forward the notice to your landlord. See our tenant-fined guide.
Scenario 2: landlord paid the fine and is billing you
The owner paid the corporation. Now they want you to reimburse. You think you shouldn't have to.
Forum: RTDRS. You file if the landlord starts deducting from your damage deposit or sues you. See our landlord-pass-through analysis.
Scenario 3: you and the corporation both think you should dispute the fine, but the landlord is dragging their feet
You think the fine is procedurally defective. Your landlord is the one who has to file at the CDRT, but they're reluctant ($150 + their time).
Forum: CDRT (but the owner files). You: consider offering to cover the $150 filing fee + buying a $15 FineCheck report yourself. Show your landlord the procedural defects in writing. Many landlords flip from “not worth my time” to “sure” once the case looks strong.
Scenario 4: landlord is trying to evict you over a bylaw breach
Forum: RTDRS. Eviction proceedings against a residential tenant always go through the RTA framework, not the condo bylaw framework. The condo bylaw may have given rise to the eviction notice but RTDRS decides whether the eviction is lawful.
Scenario 5: your landlord refuses to fix something in the unit
Forum: RTDRS. Maintenance and habitability fall under the Residential Tenancies Act. Even if the corporation is the actual responsible party for common-property repairs, your dispute is with your landlord (who's your contractual counterparty), not the corporation.
How to decide quickly
- Who do you have a contractual relationship with?
- Landlord → RTDRS
- Corporation (you're an owner) → CDRT
- Neither (you're a tenant, the corporation is the issue) → indirect; landlord has to file at CDRT for you
- Which statute governs the underlying dispute?
- Residential Tenancies Act → RTDRS
- Condominium Property Act → CDRT
- Which fee can you afford? $75 (RTDRS) vs. $150 (CDRT). Cheaper isn't always appropriate — pick by jurisdiction, not by price.
What FineCheck helps with
FineCheck is specifically built around CDRT-eligible fine disputes. The $15 report:
- Tells you whether the underlying condo fine notice is procedurally enforceable (the analysis that grounds a CDRT challenge)
- Gives you cited evidence you can hand to your landlord (if you're a tenant) to persuade them to file
- Provides the basis for an RTDRS defence if the landlord tries to pass through a procedurally-defective fine to you
FineCheck doesn't advise on RTDRS-specific matters (rent, repairs, damage deposits, evictions). For those, the Alberta.ca RTDRS page is the primary resource.
Got a condo bylaw fine? Whether you're the owner or the tenant, the procedural-compliance check is the same. Check the fine — $15.
This page reflects Alberta law as we understand it. It is not legal advice. RTDRS-specific advice on tenancy matters is best sought from CPLEA (Centre for Public Legal Education Alberta) or an Alberta lawyer.